Code Review

Code review, Codereview, Peer review, Code inspection, Pull request review, Merge request review
Code review is the systematic checking of source code by fellow developers before changes go into production. This increases code quality and prevents costly errors.

What is Code Review?

Code review is the process by which one or more developers check a colleague's source code before merging it with the main version of an application. During a review you look at readability, logic, security and compliance with agreed standards. For SMEs that have a ecommerce store, customer portal or custom application built, code review is the most important quality check. It prevents errors, security holes or technical faults from ending up in your system unnoticed.

How code review works in practice

A developer makes changes in a separate version of the code, called a branch. Once the work is done, the developer opens a pull request or merge request. Other team members review the code line by line, asking questions, making suggestions and highlighting potential problems. Only after the review is approved may the code be merged. This is often done through platforms such as GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. In an SME context with outside developers or a small in-house team, this is the time when you check that the work fits your requirements and future maintainability. A good review takes between 15 minutes and an hour, depending on the complexity of the change.

Why code review came about and why it matters now

Code review became popular as software teams grew larger and collaboration through version control systems such as Git became the norm. The idea is simple: four eyes see more than two. Mistakes overlooked by the original developer catch the eye of a colleague immediately. In the early days of software development, programmers often worked solo, but as applications became more complex and business-critical, the need for structured quality control increased. For SMBs, code review is now relevant because you often work with changing external parties. A thorough review gives you insight into what is being built and prevents you from depending on one person who is the only one who understands the code.

What code review brings to SMEs

Code review reduces the number of bugs that end up in production, improves security and makes your code easier to transfer to another developer. In practice, we see with SME customers that an ecommerce store without code review often suffers from small but irritating errors: wrong price calculations, slow loading times or forms that do not submit. A single thorough review prevents your customers from encountering these. In addition, a junior developer learns faster through feedback from a senior. If you're having a new website development or expanding an existing application, explicitly ask if code review is part of the process. At web development by Monkey Vision, peer review is a standard part of every project. This way you can be sure that code not only works, but is also understandable and secure. You can read more about the importance of structured development in the Google Developers documentation.

Applications of Code Review

Code review fits into different phases of a development process. You can use it for new features, bug fixes, performance optimizations or cleaning up old code. Below you can read where SME companies apply code review most effectively and when it is better to skip it.

New functionalities for ecommerce stores and customer portals

If you have a new checkout flow, a product configurator or a link to your accounting system built, code review is essential. These functionalities directly touch your sales or business operations. A review verifies that the logic is correct, that the API integration is set up securely and that the code is scalable as your assortment grows. In practice, we find that outside agencies sometimes take shortcuts to deliver faster. A thorough review exposes this. An ecommerce store with 800 products that gets a new filter function deserves a review of at least 45 minutes. This prevents filters from loading slowly or certain products from not appearing in search results.

Bug fixes and hotfixes under time pressure

Even in emergency solutions, code review pays off. A hotfix implemented quickly without review often solves one problem but introduces another. Think of a pricing error in your ecommerce store that you want to correct quickly: without a review, you risk that the fix only works for one product category or that the VAT calculation is no longer correct. A shortened review of 10 to 15 minutes is sufficient here. Ask a colleague or second developer to check that the change has no side effects. In WordPress website maintenance, this is a standard step before a patch goes live. This keeps your site stable, even under pressure.

Refactoring and addressing technical debt

Refactoring means rewriting code without changing functionality. You do this to improve readability, increase performance or replace old dependencies. Code review is crucial here because refactoring is intended to simplify future maintenance. A review verifies that the new code is really better than the old and that no functionality is lost. For example, an SME with a five-year-old WordPress site may decide to rewrite custom plugins. Without a review, you run the risk that the new code will not perform as well or that certain edge cases will no longer work. A thorough review here takes 60 to 90 minutes, but saves weeks of debugging afterwards.

When code review is the right choice and when it is not

Code review is useful for any changes that impact users, security or business logic. It is less useful for minor textual changes, updating documentation or adjusting CSS styling without logic. If you're a sole proprietor and developing on your own, you can skip code review for experimental prototypes or internal tools that no one else is using. Once you work with a team, outside developers or an agency, code review is not optional. It protects your investment and keeps you from becoming dependent on one person. In quotes, always ask if review is included and who the reviewer is. An agency that doesn't do this by default poses higher risks.

Want to apply this to your business? Monkey Vision helps SME entrepreneurs with web design, SEO and smart digital solutions. Schedule a no-obligation meeting and find out what's possible for you.

Schedule an introduction

Frequently Asked Questions

No, code review and testing are complementary but not the same thing. Testing checks that the application does what you expect: does the button work, does the email arrive, is the calculation correct. Code review looks at how the code is written: is the logic clear, are there any security risks, is the code maintainable. An application can pass all the tests but still have poorly written code. Conversely, code can look nice but contain bugs that are not noticed until edge cases. In practice, we see that SMBs often only do functional testing, but not review. This results in a working product in the short term, but technical debt and high maintenance costs in the long term. Combine both for optimal quality.

It depends on your team composition and the complexity of your code. If you have an in-house developer or technical lead, they can do internal reviews on work done by externals or juniors. If you don't have in-house technical expertise, outsource the review to an independent party or ask your development agency to organize peer review. Note: never let the same person who wrote the code also be the sole reviewer. At Monkey Vision , we always work with at least two developers per project, so every change goes through a different pair of eyes. For one-off projects, you can have an external code audit done after delivery. That costs between 1,000 and 3,000 euros depending on the scope, but gives you assurance about what you have received.

The biggest pitfall is that code review becomes superficial. A reviewer who only checks that the code runs misses structural issues. Another pitfall is that reviews take too long because reviewers discuss too many details or discuss personal preferences rather than objective quality. In SME contexts, we often see outside agencies offering code review but not budgeting time for it. It then ends up as a five-minute formality. Therefore, agree in advance how much time is budgeted per review and who the reviewer is. A third pitfall is that feedback is not followed up. A review only has value if the findings are also processed before the code goes live. Make this part of your acceptance criteria.

The best approach depends on your current development process and the parties you are working with. If you are building a new application or ecommerce store, ask during the proposal phase how code review is organized. Do you already have an existing site or application and want to know if the quality is ok, consider a one-time code audit. At Monkey Vision we offer a free 45-minute technical scan in which we go through your current code live. You'll get instant insight into three areas of improvement around security, performance and maintainability, plus an honest assessment of whether a thorough review or refactoring is needed. Schedule a session through web development at Monkey Vision and know where you stand.

About the author

Monkey Vision

Monkey Vision is a full-service digital agency at Nijmegen, specializing in web design, SEO, and AI automation for small and medium-sized businesses. The knowledge base has been compiled by our team of online strategists and is continuously updated based on current insights.

Publication date: 26-04-2026
Last update: 26-04-2026