User Testing

User testing, Usability testing, User research, UX testing, User testing, Usability test
User testing is testing a website or app with real users to find problems and areas for improvement. It prevents wrong assumptions about what visitors understand or don't understand.

What is User Testing?

User testing is the process of letting real users use a website, ecommerce store or app while you observe where they get stuck, what they don't understand and how they navigate through your interface. You get immediate feedback on what works and what doesn't, without assumptions or opinions from the team. The results show what elements you need to adjust to improve conversion, findability or ease of use. For SMBs, it's an effective way to avoid investing in features or content that no one uses.

How user testing works in practice

You select a group of people similar to your target audience and give them a concrete task, such as finding a product, filling out a form or requesting a quote. While they perform the task, you watch along via a screen recording or live session and ask them to think out loud. That way, you hear immediately where someone is hesitating, missing something or has a different expectation. Most sessions last 15 to 30 minutes per person. With five to eight participants, you already find the biggest bottlenecks. Tools such as Hotjar, Maze or UserTesting automate part of the process, but a simple Teams session with screen sharing also works.

Why user testing came into being and why it remains important today

User testing stems from the human-computer interaction studies of the 1980s, when software developers noticed that experts could not objectively evaluate their own interfaces. What seems logical to a developer is often unclear to an outsider. Since then, testing with users has become the standard in product design. Today it is even more relevant because competition is greater online and visitors have less patience. An unclear checkout or confusing navigation will cost you immediate sales. In practice, we often see with SME clients that an assumption about how customers search turns out to be completely different from what users do in a test.

What user testing brings to SMEs

User testing helpt je beslissingen te nemen op basis van gedrag in plaats van meningen. Je ontdekt welke call-to-action bezoekers over het hoofd zien, welke teksten ze verkeerd interpreteren en waar ze afhaken in een proces. Dat maakt het makkelijker om prioriteiten te stellen bij een redesign of bij het laten maken van een nieuwe website. Een webshop met een onduidelijke filterstructuur verliest klanten voordat ze bij de checkout komen. Een B2B-dienstverlener met een te technisch contactformulier mist leads. User testing laat precies zien waar die momenten zitten. Het voorkomt dat je tijd en budget steekt in features die niemand nodig heeft en helpt je focussen op wat echt impact heeft op conversie en klanttevredenheid.

Applications of User Testing

User testing can be used at different stages of a project and for a variety of purposes. It works both upfront, to validate choices, and downstream, to identify bottlenecks in an existing site or ecommerce store. Below are four concrete situations in which SMEs use user testing to achieve better results.

Validate a new design before you build

Voordat je een designer of ontwikkelaar laat bouwen, kun je een klikbaar prototype of wireframe laten testen door potentiële gebruikers. Zo ontdek je of de structuur logisch is, of mensen vinden wat ze zoeken en of de tone of voice aansluit. Een voorbeeld: een adviesbureau met twaalf medewerkers wilde een nieuwe site met een uitgebreide kennisbank. In een vroege test bleek dat bezoekers de zoekfunctie verwachtten bovenaan de pagina, niet in het menu. Die aanpassing kostte weinig moeite in het ontwerp, maar zou na oplevering veel meer werk zijn geweest. Dit soort testen voorkomt dat je verkeerde aannames inbouwt in de definitieve versie. Je bespaart ontwikkeltijd en frustratie achteraf.

Improve an existing checkout or application process

If you notice that many visitors drop out during the ordering process or a quote request, user testing can show exactly where and why that happens. You take users through the process and ask them to think out loud. It often turns out that a required field is unclear, a button does not stand out or the order of steps is confusing. One ecommerce store with five hundred products discovered that customers saw the shipping costs field too late and dropped out. By showing that information earlier, conversion increased by twelve percent. User testing gives you concrete leads for optimization of your ecommerce store without having to guess which change will have an effect.

Testing new functionality or content

When you add a new feature, such as a configurator, a knowledge base search function or an interactive form, you want to know if users understand how it works. User testing shows whether the instructions are clear, whether the interface is intuitive and whether people are getting the outcome they expect. An installation company built an online calculator for solar panels. In the test, it turned out that visitors didn't understand what information to enter under "roof surface. Adding a tooltip with a simple explanation increased the number of completed calculations by thirty percent. Without a test, the team would not have noticed this lack of clarity because they themselves knew what was meant.

When user testing is the right choice and when it is not

User testing works best when you have concrete questions about behavior or understanding. It is less suitable if you only want opinions on color or style, because that often provides subjective feedback without actionable perspective. It also makes little sense to test with too small a target audience or with people who would never use your site. A B2B platform for accountants does not test with students, but with real financials. If your budget or time is limited, you can start with a simple setup: five people, one task, record screen. That already provides enough insight to find the biggest problems. User testing doesn't replace A/B testing, but you can combine both: first qualitative testing to understand what doesn't work, then quantitative testing to measure which solution performs best.

Want to apply this to your business? Monkey Vision helps SME entrepreneurs with web design, SEO and smart digital solutions. Schedule a no-obligation meeting and find out what's possible for you.

Schedule an introduction

Frequently Asked Questions

No, user testing and A/B testing complement each other but are substantially different. User testing lets you see why visitors get stuck or drop out somewhere by looking at their behavior and statements. You discover which elements are unclear, where frustration lies and what people expect. A/B testing measures which of two variants performs better in conversion or click behavior, without you knowing exactly why. In practice, you use user testing to find bottlenecks and come up with solutions. Then you use A/B testing to measure which solution has the most effect. Without user testing, you often test based on assumptions, which yields less focused results.

Five to eight participants per target group is enough for most SME situations to find the biggest issues. Research from the Nielsen Norman Group shows that with five users you discover about 85 percent of usability problems. More participants add few new insights unless you have multiple target groups, for example, both end customers and business buyers. Then you test separately for each target group. Quality of participants is more important than quantity: make sure they resemble your real visitors in terms of experience, context and intent. An ecommerce store for professional tools tests with professionals, not hobbyists. For complex products or services you can expand to ten participants, but always start small and repeat the test after adjustments.

The biggest mistake is directing too much during the test. When you give hints or explain how something works, you are no longer testing what a user understands independently. Let participants search and fail on their own; that yields the most valuable insights. A second common mistake is testing with the wrong target audience, such as colleagues or friends who already know your product. They have prior knowledge and behave differently than real visitors. A third mistake is setting tasks that are too broad, such as "explore the site. Give concrete tasks that match what a customer would really do, for example, 'order a product under a hundred euros' or 'request a quote for three employees'. Finally, many teams forget to prioritize results: not every problem is equally urgent. Focus first on what is blocking conversion or understanding the most.

The best approach depends on where you are now and what questions you have. Do you notice visitors dropping out but don't know why? Or are you hesitating between two designs and want to know which one works better? In a free 45-minute UX-scan at Monkey Vision we walk through your current site or prototype and give you three concrete improvements you can pick up this month. You will also get an assessment of whether a full round of user testing makes sense for your situation, or whether a simpler approach such as heatmaps or analytics will provide enough insight. Not a sales pitch, but practical advice based on what we see working for comparable SMEs.

About the author

Monkey Vision

Monkey Vision is a full-service digital agency in Remote, specializing in web design, SEO and AI automation for SMEs. The knowledge base is compiled by our team of online strategists and continuously updated based on current insights.

Publication date: 26-04-2026
Last update: 26-04-2026